If you don’t see this in your navigation, your administrator can switch the module on under Administration → Modules, or it may not be included in your plan.


The header
The third is the figure the screen exists for: an action completed, verified and then reviewed as
ineffective is the register saying the diagnosis was wrong. Two notices appear above the tabs
whenever they apply — actions reviewed and found not to have worked, and actions completed that
nobody has verified — and each jumps to the Actions tab.
Open an investigation starts a new one. The screen has three tabs: Investigations,
Actions and Failures, each with a count.
Investigations
Opening an investigation
Open an investigation opens a form above the list.

Open creates it and opens it. A Reliability Repeat fault
recommendation is usually what prompts one.
Inside an investigation


Findings
The findings are drawn the way the method reads:
Each finding has:
This is the root cause marks a finding as a root cause; Not the root cause takes the mark
off. More than one finding can be marked.
Concluding
Write What the investigation concluded and press Conclude.Actions
Add under Actions records a corrective or preventive action.
The effectiveness review is set ninety days after the due date unless you say otherwise. A review
dated the day the work finished would ask whether a change worked before anything had time to recur.
Each action card shows its reference (CAPA-2026-00001), kind, standing, owner, due date, and —
once they exist — the verification note and the review.
Actions
The Actions tab is the register of every corrective and preventive action, sorted by what each is waiting for rather than by date, so the ones needing a decision come first.

It did not is a result, not a failure to record one.
Failures
The Failures tab lists work orders that have been classified — what failed, why and how.

A work order only becomes a failure when somebody says what kind of failure it was; until then the
product can count downtime but can say nothing about modes. Keeping the three lists apart is the
point: bearing seized is a mode, misalignment is a cause and fatigue is a mechanism, and a
chart of “bearing failure” tells nobody whether to buy a better coupling or train a fitter. The
lists are kept under the failure taxonomy.
Who can do what
See roles for the defaults.

